:

Rachel Cook & John Bridger

Rachel Cook and John Bridger are a training partnership just three years into their career, having started out together in 2023. In that time they have sent out 26 winners — a modest but meaningful tally for a yard still finding its feet at this level.Based on TrackLab's AI analysis
Quick Facts
Role
Trainer
Based
Liphook, Hants
Record
7 wins from 174 races
Win rate
4.0%
Best course
Brighton (11.8% from 17 races)
Best going
Good to firm (drying out)

📊 Key Numbers

A snapshot of this trainer's performance over the last 12 months
174
Races
7
Wins
4.0%
Win rate
avg ~10%
22.4%
Place rate (top 3)
avg ~30%

🐎 Today's & Upcoming Runners

Horses Rachel Cook & John Bridger has entered for upcoming races

🔍 Full Analysis

TrackLab's AI-generated assessment based on career data and recent form
TrackLab's Trainer Breakdown
Auto-Generated

The last twelve months have been tougher than the year before. Their win rate has slipped from around 1 in every 12 races last season to roughly 1 in every 25 this time around — 7 winners from 174 runners. That kind of dip is not unusual for a small yard navigating the grind of a full season, but it is the sort of thing that will need to turn around if they are to build on what they established in year two.

There are genuine bright spots worth pointing to. Their most reliable ally in the saddle is jockey Rhys Clutterbuck, who has won 3 races from 30 rides for the yard — that is 1 in every 10, a solid return that suggests a productive working relationship built on familiarity. The horse they know best is Imperial Cult, who has won 3 of his 32 races with the yard. Three wins from 32 sounds modest, but keeping the same horse in the yard for that many races and continuing to find the right opportunities for him says something about how Cook and Bridger manage their horses patiently rather than chasing quick results.

One clear pattern in the data is that the yard does its best work when the ground is fast and dry — 3 winners from 47 races in those conditions, roughly 1 in every 16, which is meaningfully better than their overall record. For anyone following their horses, that is a useful clue: when the sun has been out and the ground has dried out, Cook and Bridger's runners tend to perform.

Three years in, this is still a yard in the process of becoming something. The volume of runners — 174 in a single season — shows real ambition and a willingness to compete, and 26 career winners is a foundation to build from. The next step is converting that activity into a better win rate.

📈 Form Trend

How this trainer's win rate has changed month by month
Monthly win rate
2025–2026
5%
May
0%
Jun
8.7%
Jul
0%
Aug
4.8%
Sep
4.2%
Oct
28.6%
Nov
0%
Dec
0%
Jan
0%
Feb
0%
Mar
0%
Apr

🎯 Where This Trainer Thrives

Performance broken down by ground, class, and track type
🌧 Ground Conditions
Good to firm (drying out)
Loves
Heavy (very wet)
Loves
Standard (all-weather)
Good (firm-ish)
Ok
Good to soft (some give)
Avoids
Standard to slow (all-weather)
Avoids
Soft (muddy)
Avoids
Firm (dry)
Avoids
🏅 Competition Level
Class 2 (high-level)
Avoids
Class 3 (mid-level)
Avoids
Class 4 (standard)
Avoids
Class 5 (entry-level)
Class 6 (grassroots)
🏟 Track Shape
Left-handed, hilly
Loves
Left-handed, long straights
Loves
Left-handed, tight turns
Long straights
Unknown
Right-handed, hilly
Avoids
Right-handed, long straights
Avoids
Right-handed, tight turns
Avoids

🏇 Jockey Partnerships

The riders they work with most, sorted by rides together
Rhys Clutterbuck First Choice
10%
Win rate
3/30
Won / Rode
8%
Win rate
2/25
Won / Rode
Ryan Kavanagh
4.8%
Win rate
1/21
Won / Rode
5.9%
Win rate
1/17
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/11
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/6
Won / Rode
Jack Callan
0%
Win rate
0/5
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/4
Won / Rode
Ashley Lewis
0%
Win rate
0/4
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/4
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/3
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/3
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/3
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/3
Won / Rode
Jack Dace
0%
Win rate
0/3
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/2
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/2
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/2
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/2
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/2
Won / Rode

Top Horses

The strongest horses currently associated with this trainer
Form: 25833-
Form: 858-56
Form: 5-0000
Form: 253857
Form: 1154-3
Form: 314221
Form: 33588-
Form: 008765
Form: 40223-

🏟 Course Record

Win rate at each course, sorted by number of races
CourseRacesWinsWin rate
Lingfield Park 59 3 5.1%
Windsor 20 0 0%
Brighton 17 2 11.8%
Kempton Park 15 0 0%
Salisbury 14 0 0%
Bath 13 1 7.7%
Goodwood 12 0 0%
Epsom Downs 8 0 0%
Newbury 7 1 14.3%
Sandown Park 4 0 0%
Ascot 2 0 0%
chelmsford 2 0 0%
Chepstow 1 0 0%

📅 Recent Results

The last 20 results, most recent first
30 Apr
Kempton Park · 7f – 1m · Standard_To_Slow
2 Mar
Kempton Park · 5f – 6½f · Standard_To_Slow
3rd
25 Feb
Kempton Park · 7f – 1m · Standard_To_Slow
25 Feb
Lingfield Park · 7f – 1m · Standard
21 Feb
Lingfield Park · 5f – 6½f · Standard
3rd
12 Feb
Lingfield Park · 7f – 1m · Standard
6th
7 Feb
Lingfield Park · 5f – 6½f · Standard
3rd
24 Jan
Lingfield Park · 5f – 6½f · Standard
6th
21 Jan
Lingfield Park · 5f – 6½f · Standard
4th
19 Jan
Kempton Park · 5f – 6½f · Standard_To_Slow
7th
14 Jan
Lingfield Park · 5f – 6½f · Standard
6th
14 Jan
Lingfield Park · 5f – 6½f · Standard
7th
10 Jan
Lingfield Park · 5f – 6½f · Standard
5th
10 Jan
Lingfield Park · 7f – 1m · Standard
8th
8 Jan
chelmsford · 1m3f – 1m4f · Standard
9th
8 Jan
chelmsford · 5f – 6½f · Standard
10th
7 Jan
Kempton Park · 5f – 6½f · Standard_To_Slow
4th
3 Jan
Lingfield Park · 7f – 1m · Standard_To_Slow
5th
3 Jan
Lingfield Park · 5f – 6½f · Standard_To_Slow
3rd
22 Dec
Lingfield Park · 5f – 6½f · Standard
7th